Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Romeo vs Maryna Kolb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romeo vs Kolb analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Romeo vs Maryna Kolb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Romeo 1 - 0 Kolb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romeo has won 38.3% of points on his second serve, while Kolb has won 32.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romeo, in recent form, has won 55.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kolb has won 48.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.95% and 31.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romeo has saved 47.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kolb has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romeo has won 42.11% of matches played (W/L 16/ 22), with Kolb winning 21.05% (W/L 4/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romeo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 210/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kolb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 24% (W/L 5/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Romeo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 14), where as Kolb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 3/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Romeo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Romeo winning 2 and Kolb winning 0. The last match between Romeo and Kolb was at the W75+H Saint-Gaudens, 06-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Caroline Romeo getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romeo and Kolb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Romeo winning 0 times and Kolb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Romeo winning 1, and Kolb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romeo has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.74 while Kolb has played against players with an average rank of 201.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romeo has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kolb has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romeo has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kolb has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
756
Rank
401
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
58% (305-222)
Career Total W/L
30% (45-105)
20% (2-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caroline Romeo | Maryna Kolb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (48/72) | 55% (36/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (28/48) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (9/24) | 31% (9/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (36/65) | 49% (35/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Caroline Romeo
Player
Maryna Kolb
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Romeo | Maryna Kolb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (6/16) | 0% (0/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (85/122) | 30% (16/37) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.64 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.5 | 528.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (457/685) | 56% (99/178) |
| 1st Serve W% | 51% (234/457) | 58% (57/99) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 36% (83/228) | 33% (26/79) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (42/91) | 38% (6/16) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (305/670) | 39% (67/174) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Caroline Romeo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Caroline Romeo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
53%
(
32 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Caroline Romeo
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Romeo
Player
Maryna Kolb
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Caroline Romeo
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Caroline Romeo
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Caroline Romeo
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
42 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Romeo
Player
Maelle Leclercq
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kovaleva
Player
Caroline Romeo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luana Plaza Araujo
Player
Caroline Romeo
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanna Silva
Player
Caroline Romeo
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Maryna Kolb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Romeo
Player
Maryna Kolb
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Lee
Player
Maryna Kolb
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Maryna Kolb
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chloe Noel
Player
Maryna Kolb
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Romeo Vs Kolb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
